I had to return them. The waist fit fine but they were baggy in the hips and butt. I ended up buying a pair of the men's ripstop pants. Fit great. And I like the fabric, too.

I like the last woman's navy pants, these are more stretchy. Work pants should durable. Will be buy more because I need navy for work, and no one makes navy work pants for woman.

I really love these pants! They are durable and stylish at the same time. So functional for my job. They do run bigger, so I sized down one size.

They looks good but not long. I bought two pairs one size bigger to have them a little loose. They got stretched and twisted just after couple of laundries. And in total lasted one year- half year each pair before started to fry in multiple places- belt area, pockets area, bottom, trouser legs. Extremely poor quality for the price and the brand.

I recommend this pant. I have a lifelong history of challenges of finding tailored, non-binary-in-style, and great-fitting pants for my female body. Over the years, clothing companies have not made slacks I like in my size which varies from about 16-22, depending on which decade. It is as if clothing companies think women above 18 want something of a frou-frou design. I have worn men's pants, including Carhartt styles, but the last I ordered were cut too low on the fanny area. I reluctantly experimented with Carhartt's women's Ashland pant, and for the most part, love it. Not too high or too low on the hip. Great around the waist and the length. Great texture and comfort. Wonderful color. And well-designed pockets and carpenter loops. My only concern with fit is that the legs are more tapered than I like, and the pant legs are snugger around the knees and lower leg than I like. But I am growing used to them. Another concern is the price is higher than for the men's pants from Carhartt.